This page provides a myriad of resources developed from comprehensive research on the long-term impacts of hydropower development. Through years of study and collaboration, the Wa Ni Ska Tan team has explored and documented the complex and ongoing environmental, economic, cultural, and health impacts on Indigenous communities associated with decades of hydropower operations. The information presented here reflects a comprehensive understanding of these issues, providing valuable knowledge and insights to governments, policymakers, industry, and the general public seeking to grasp the broader implications of hydropower on ecosystems, Indigenous communities, and well-being.
Funded research and community projects represent a diverse and deeply rooted effort to support Indigenous sovereignty, environmental justice, and community well-being in Northern Manitoba. From food and legal empowerment to storytelling, education, and ecological research, each initiative uplifts local voices and traditional knowledge systems in response to the impacts of hydro development. Together, they reflect a collective movement toward reconciliation, cultural resurgence, and sustainable futures.
Wa Ni Ska Tan: Challenging the Harms of Hydroelectric Dams features an interview with Dr. Ramona Neckoway and Dr. Stephane McLachlan, two researchers studying the environmental and social impacts of hydroelectricity projects on Indigenous communities in Manitoba. They discuss Wa Ni Ska Tan, and challenge the common perception of hydroelectricity as a purely “green” energy source, highlighting its destructive effects on ecosystems, land, and Indigenous ways of life. The podcast also explores the importance of centering Indigenous voices in decision-making and the need for equitable collaborations between impacted communities and researchers.
This podcast provides an update on the Churchill railway flood-out situation in Northern Manitoba, where many residents are examining water levels and their firsthand experiences. The discussion delves into growing concerns that Manitoba Hydro may have opened floodgates to safeguard the Keeyask generating station, potentially causing widespread flooding in the Churchill/Nelson basin. The episode highlights local perspectives, evidence, and the broader implications of these events on communities in the region.
Amid a wave of hydro development in the 1970s, Manitoba Hydro and the province promised Cree communities prosperity. Instead, people were displaced from their lands, traditional economies were decimated, and many communities were plunged into poverty.
A half century later, southerners continue to benefit from the maze of dams along the Nelson and Churchill rivers and their tributaries. Most Cree communities have accepted compensation from Manitoba Hydro, and some have even become partners in recent projects like the Wuskwatim and Keeyask dams.
In 2011, a human-made flood in Manitoba’s Interlake region displaced 17 First Nation communities, leading to severe health and emotional impacts. In response, Elders gathered in 2015 to share healing strategies—emphasizing forgiveness, unity, cultural reclamation, self-determination, and reconnection with the land—captured through participatory research and shared in a healing booklet and website.
The study analyzes an environmental hearing on the Keeyask hydro dam in northern Manitoba, revealing both support and concern. While proponents praised its inclusive partnership and economic benefits, critics highlighted potential environmental and health impacts, stressing the need for close oversight to ensure Indigenous communities truly benefit.
Hydroelectric development in Canada has often overlooked Indigenous perspectives, as seen in the case of the O-Pipon-Na Piwin Cree Nation (OPCN) in northern Manitoba. The lack of genuine consultation and disregard for OPCN’s water governance concept, Kistihtamahwin, led to the collapse of a vital fishery and deep cultural, environmental, and economic harm—highlighting the need for local knowledge and cultural values in applying UNDRIP to water governance.
In Canada, access to clean water and sanitation is strongly linked to health outcomes among First Nations, Métis, and Inuit populations. Data from national surveys and a case study in St. Theresa Point First Nation show that poor water infrastructure is associated with higher illness rates—underscoring the urgent need for improved infrastructure, education, and support, particularly in northern and off-reserve communities.
When the water goes up behind the $8.7-billion Keeyask Dam in northern Manitoba, one family will lose more than any other. This short documentary, filmed by Brad Leitch, combines their story with the story of Ellen Cook who grew up in the shadow of another dam and imagines a future beyond concrete.
Link coming soon
Link coming soon
Link coming soon
In Our Backyard: Keeyask and the Legacy of Hydroelectric Development examines the Keeyask dam and development on the Nelson River through the perspectives of Indigenous peoples, scholars, scientists, and regulators. Building on the 2012 Clean Environment Commission hearings, it highlights often-overlooked Indigenous voices and informs ongoing decisions and research on resource development. The book explores impact assessments, Indigenous laws and worldviews, economic considerations, monitoring models, and the social, cultural, and ecological effects of development.
The concept of “Water is Life” is universally acknowledged, but Indigenous and Western perspectives diverge significantly in their understanding of its meaning. For First Nations peoples, water is a sacred, life-giving force deeply interconnected with all elements of Creation—viewed as the blood of the Earth and treated with reverence and responsibility. In contrast, Western societies often regard water as a resource to be harnessed for practical needs, particularly for energy generation. While hydroelectric power is valued for its environmental benefits in mitigating climate change, this approach reflects a more commodity-based view of nature.
This report critically examines Manitoba Hydro’s Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Manitoba–Minnesota Transmission Project (MMTP) through a cross-cultural and socio-environmental lens. It argues that key elements of the EIS are insufficient, particularly in how it addresses valued components, cumulative effects, and adaptive management. The analysis highlights shortcomings in the project’s environmental protection, monitoring, and mitigation strategies, as well as serious concerns regarding the depth and quality of engagement with the public—especially with affected First Nations and Métis communities, whose knowledge and experiences are vital yet underrepresented in the assessment process.
This report aims to situate the National Energy Board’s hearing and decision-making regarding the construction of the Manitoba-Minnesota Transmission Project (“MMTP”) in an Indigenous context, with attention to the particular context of Treaty One.
This report presents a firsthand perspective to the National Energy Board from an Indigenous mother and grandmother, whose more than ten-year journey across Manitoba’s Hydro-affected regions oRffers deep insight into the extensive and enduring impacts of hydroelectric development. Drawing on lived experience and cultural knowledge, the report critiques the current energy proposal under review—energy drawn from Manitoba Hydro’s integrated system of generating facilities—and highlights the broader implications of exporting this energy to U.S. markets, pending federal approval.
This testimony expresses deep frustration with the federal government’s failure to uphold its constitutional and moral obligations to Indigenous peoples, especially regarding land, resource rights, and heritage protection. It critiques the piecemeal approach to environmental assessments related to Manitoba Hydro projects, calling instead for a comprehensive, Indigenous-led review that honors treaty rights, cultural heritage, and the spiritual connection to the land.
The newsletter connects you with Indigenous water and land rights through stories, research, articles, community voices, and art. Content from communities all across the world provide a grass roots perspective on issues of development including, but not exclusively, hydro development. https://hydroimpacted.ca/category/newsletter/
Wa Ni Ska Tan commissioned Jerch Law to explore the legal foundation of Aboriginal Rights to water in Canadian law. The resulting legal opinion outlines potential legal strategies for Indigenous communities to assert water-related rights within the constraints of Canadian jurisprudence. The research emphasizes the distinction between “Aboriginal law” (as defined by Canadian courts) and “Indigenous law” (based on longstanding Indigenous legal traditions). It concludes that asserting a direct Aboriginal Right to water is unlikely to succeed under Canadian law, but rights connected to water-based activities may offer a more viable legal path.
Presentations explore the dynamic relationships between people, place, and the environment—drawing on Indigenous knowledge systems, community-based research, and sustainable practices. From the sacred significance of water in First Nations worldviews to innovative approaches in conservation, land stewardship, and geospatial research, each presentation highlights unique pathways toward ecological responsibility and cultural resilience. Together, they reflect a shared commitment to justice, sustainability, and respectful coexistence with the natural world.
Supported student research focuses on Indigenous-led exploration of environmental, legal, health, and cultural issues in communities affected by hydro development and colonization. Student research projects examine the harmful impacts of dams on ecosystems and wellbeing, as well as legal pathways toward justice and revenue sharing. Many students address food and water sovereignty, and the critical importance of culturally grounded health frameworks. Others emphasize the integration of Indigenous knowledge systems with Western science, promoting decolonized approaches to research and governance. Collectively, this work empowers Indigenous voices and imagines more just, sovereign, and sustainable futures
Events span a wide spectrum—from conferences and land-based camps to public rallies, regulatory hearings, and advocacy campaigns. Together, they promote Indigenous leadership, environmental justice, water sovereignty, and cultural revitalization through knowledge sharing, policy engagement, and community action. Each type of event plays a role in building awareness, fostering connection, and driving change.